Why hrd needs should be prioritized

In this unit both stages will be examined. The research examined a number of British manufacturing subsidiaries to determine how their productivity compared with that in the parent factories, and what factors seemed to explain any differences.

Most of the factories made light electrical and electronic equipment. Assembly was the main production activity, with some plastic moulding, machining, metal pressing, cutting and welding.

Most employees were unskilled and female. There were many reasons for differences in productivity between subsidiaries and parent companies, to do with product design, methods of production and organization, quality of supplies, and so on.

However, the great majority of the reasons were to do with the skills, knowledge and attitudes of people, and therefore had direct implications for human resource management and development in those organizations.

The most productive factories had: - High quality, industrious and dedicated managers Performance and attitudes that would not be tolerated in Germany or Japan were tolerated in the UK, with foremen and supervisors singled out as being the weakest level.

Failure to achieve targets meant questions not only for the operative but also for the superior. Application and the will to learn were crucial in that connection, and most training was job related. How should we approach the task of identifying and achieving agreement on HRD needs and priorities related to productivity, when so many other factors can explain and improve poor rates?

It is essential to start by considering the processes whereby action is to be achieved. A number of different processes can be employed; they are discussed in the section below. This is a relevant and effective type of process where there has been no previous data-gathering exercise, where no clear starting point is evident, and where, above all, it is politically essential to obtain the support and active involvement of top management in analysing major issues with HRD implications and in producing recommendations to resolve them.

Quality circles In most Japanese companies quality circles are an intrinsic part of the normal organization structure and culture of the factory; they continuously identify needs and ideas for action related to productivity, with the active involvement and support of higher management. At Jaguar in the mid-eighties, when John Egan was struggling to achieve a turnaround of the company, special quality circles were set up for the purpose of identifying problems and working out how to resolve them; recommendations and decisions on priorities for action were then taken by senior management.

Such a process is relevant when, as in that example, acute difficulties face the company, speed is essential in identifying and solving problems, but so is the establishment of a team-based and collaborative culture.

However, if quality circles are to endure in an organization, research has shown that continuing effort will need to be put into team training and development, a flexible managerial structure, appropriate reward systems, and a fully supportive culture. Use of consultants External consultants may be employed to gather data, and to recommend where HRD action is needed and where priorities appear to lie. Dangers obviously exist, however, unless the consultants have sufficient expertise and knowledge of the company, as well as an ability to establish the kind of relationships that will ensure that valid data are obtained and that feasible recommendations are produced and acted upon Harrison, , reprinted These three steps are discussed in detail below.

Identify areas where there are problems with existing levels of productivity, and establish reasons; then decide which gaps would best be tackled by action related to the development of people. Are they tight enough? Demanding and precise enough? What exactly are the implications of these objectives in terms of skills, experience, organization of work, and the culture that they require? And what about methods of measurement? In the factories in the case study, productivity was generally measured by the time taken to perform a given task as a percentage of the standard hours of that task, and output per employee.

These are relatively straightforward ways of measuring productivity. However, in non-operative jobs, defining productivity objectives and methods of measuring them is much more difficult and will require patient and expert enquiry and discussion. Course Outlines - Academy of Research. Course Outline - Academy of Research. Chapter12 - ernitaniusbiz. Chapter 8 - ernitaniusbiz. Evaluating HRD Programs. Performance Management and Coaching.

Download advertisement. Add this document to collection s. You can add this document to your study collection s Sign in Available only to authorized users. Description optional. Visible to Everyone. Just me. Add this document to saved. You can add this document to your saved list Sign in Available only to authorized users.

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib For complaints, use another form. From my experience both inside organizations and as a consultant for nearly thirty years, I know of fewer ways to stifle effectiveness and engagement more than disconnects between stated purpose or values and actual organization or leader practices. We certainly have enough examples of how illegal, immoral and unethical practices have derailed organizations and leaders — Penn State, Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual and Goldman Sachs to name just a few of the latest.

We cannot sit by and assume that a combination of laws, regulations, risk management specialists and legal advisors will take care of all that. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of was passed shortly after the Enron debacle, and was an attempt to legislate ethical corporate practices. HR and HRD professionals can play a pivotal role crafting ethical cultures from the inside out by helping their organization navigate these dimensions:. Al is the founder of inTEgro, Inc.

Consultant and coach to leaders, senior teams and their organizations for over 25 years. Experience across multiple sectors creating clear strategic direction, alignment around shared goals, greater collaboration and superior execution while growing leadership and team capacities.

I have three kids and a husband.