Roger scruton why photography is not art




















Ultimately, the camera is pointing to the subject, not representing it. If one were to accept Silenus as being representational, then this action would open up the possibility of considering anything expressive to be representation, and thus there would be no difference between representational and non-representational art.

Alward dismisses these arguments and clarifies how photographs are representational. Also, cameras are not used to point or signify an object. They reproduce images of the object. Alward argues that if cameras are means of ostension then so are pens, pencils, and paint brushes. Alward concludes that through representational casting, a photograph can be representational.

However, unlike paintings, photographs cannot be intrinsically representational. Even still, photographs can be used as a means of representation. The representation can be understood through extrinsic factors like its art-historical context or the artistic statement. Often, more interest is developed by placing any form of art within context. If photographs can be representational, then one could argue they would be aesthetically interesting as representational art. Alward, Peter.

Costello, Diarmuid and Dawn Phillips. Lopes, Dominic McIver. Phillips, Dawn M. Scruton, Roger. Stieglitz, Alfred. The Terminal. Photogravure, In order to consider it a representation, Scruton believes the artifact must be part of an intentional relation to what they represent.

Furthermore the object need not exist, i. Scruton's argument relies on the first point. A painting may represent something because the artist has done something intentionally to represent it.

For instance each brush stroke represents an intention as to how the figure is going to be portrayed. Therefore paintings may be representations. Scruton gives the example of looking at a picture of a warrior. In fact, it extends well beyond the initial shot.

Aesthetics: A Reader in Philosophy of the Arts. Scruton, Roger. Why Photography Is Not Art. Walton, Kendall. Transparent Pictures. Alward, Peter. Transparent Representation: Photography and the Art of Casting. Get Access. Powerful Essays. Roger Scruton on Photography Words 5 Pages. Roger Scruton on Photography. Read More. Good Essays. Scruton Equivalency Thesis Statement Essay. Satisfactory Essays. Demarcation Words 4 Pages. Differences between Photographic and Painted Portraiture.

Better Essays. Intentism - The Resurrection of the Author. He says the photograph relates to the subject in that it is a phot However the medium as a whole is capable of much more than Scruton is willing to allow. I believe that the clear distinction lays in the fact that Scruton's argument that photography's causal relationship is equivalent to perceiving the object without the photograph.

This is not true, because we have found distinctions where photographs and reality can never be the same. There is no doubt that you cannot see some of the intricacies of a fast moving object with the naked eye.

This brings the eye new information. It may be a mechanical depiction of how the object actually looks, but it is a unique observation of it complete with its own aesthetic interest. Therefore we must say that photography may be art. Get Access. Good Essays. Scruton Equivalency Thesis Statement Essay. Read More. Better Essays. Why Photography is Not Art. Fine Art Essay Words 3 Pages. Fine Art Essay. Photography Of The Modern World.

Powerful Essays. Descartes' Wax Argument Words 3 Pages. Descartes' Wax Argument.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000